By: legalise_drugs
7/07/2009
9:34 pm Yahoo! Profile:
legalise_drugs Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
|
heres some advice: hate blinds people and i can see your full of hate for israel
and i dont even hate palestine |
|
By: jamisonjohn@rocketmail.com
7/07/2009
9:44 pm Yahoo! Profile:
jamisonjohn@rocketmail.com Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
|
| Sure you dont LD, yer brother love personificated. Now you said we defend Obama yet chastise Israel like its a contradiction. WTF do you mean? Are you always this random? |
|
By: inbound39
7/07/2009
9:56 pm Yahoo! Profile:
inbound39 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
|
| LD...GOOGLE Samantha Powers. Dumping Israel is on the agenda. |
|
By: inbound39
7/07/2009
10:14 pm Yahoo! Profile:
inbound39 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
|
| The Arabs have made it quite clear that if Israel does not seriously negotiate for peace which means ending the occupation and settlements then within eighteen months there will be war. The ball is in Israels court and Obama has taken the Israeli blackmail card of Iran away with Bidens speech.Israel wants to deflect from the peace process so it can continue the occupation and settlements. America will not allow Israel to hold up the process and bottomline all aid could be stopped which would cripple Israels economy. |
|
By: inbound39
7/07/2009
10:40 pm Yahoo! Profile:
inbound39 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
|
US President Barack Obama strongly denied that the United States had given Israel an approval to strike Iran's nuclear facilities, in an interview given to CNN television on Tuesday.
US President Barack Obama...
US President Barack Obama gestures during his speech at the New Economic School, in Moscow, Tuesday.
Photo: AP
SLIDESHOW: Israel & Region | World
Asked by the network whether Washington had given Israel a green light to attack Iran's nuclear facilities, Obama answered: "Absolutely not." |
|
By: inbound39
7/07/2009
11:26 pm Yahoo! Profile:
inbound39 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
|
According to the Jerusalem Post, Israel Aircraft Industries has been forced out of a hurge Indian fighter jet bid. The excuse was that the deal might transfer western technology to India. However, both Boeing and Lockeed Martin are competing for the same bid. The incident illustrates the fact that Israel's dependence on the United States has become crippling.
Jul. 5, 2009
Yaakov Katz , THE JERUSALEM POST
Under pressure from the Pentagon, Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI) has been forced to back out of a joint partnership with a Swedish aerospace company to compete in a multi-billion dollar tender to sell new multi-role fighter jets to the Indian Air Force. |
|
By: inbound39
7/07/2009
11:36 pm Yahoo! Profile:
inbound39 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
|
BWIAN you are a little thick and not to well read . Let me give you some edification!!
The head of Mossad, Israel�s overseas intelligence service, has assured Benjamin Netanyahu, its prime minister, that Saudi Arabia would turn a blind eye to Israeli jets flying over the kingdom during any future raid on Iran�s nuclear sites.
Earlier this year Meir Dagan, Mossad�s director since 2002, held secret talks with Saudi officials to discuss the possibility.
The Israeli press has already carried unconfirmed reports that high-ranking officials, including Ehud Olmert, the former prime minister, held meetings with Saudi colleagues. The reports were denied by Saudi officials.
Dear Bobsadumbass....you really need to read your posts....read the last sentence in a section I copied from your post....like I said.....you never post anything of substance! |
|
By: inbound39
7/07/2009
11:47 pm Yahoo! Profile:
inbound39 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
|
Sources close to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told The Washington Times that the premier is hesitant to request formal U.S. approval to launch military operations against Iran for fear that Washington would turn him down, according to a report which appeared in Tuesday editions.
The sources said the Israeli leader feels there is no point in seeking American acquiescence at this stage given President Barack Obama's stated intention to pursue a policy of diplomatic engagement with the Tehran regime, The Washington Times reported.
"There was a decision not to press [for U.S. approval of a strike] because it was probably inadequate for the engagement policy and what we know about Obama's approach to Iran," a senior Israeli official told The Washington Times.
Advertisement
The report said that although Israel has concluded that a nuclear-armed Iran would pose an existential threat, it has refrained from attacking in deference to vital American interests in the region. |
|
By: paerina
7/07/2009
11:53 pm Yahoo! Profile:
paerina Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
|
BoB
Just in case you are in dire need of remedial reading skills the line you failed to notice in your post was:
****************The reports were DENIED by Saudi officials. |
|
By: legalise_drugs
8/07/2009
1:23 am Yahoo! Profile:
legalise_drugs Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
|
| samantha powers just proves obamas a liar and is not a ''christian'' or even eligable to be president you people are *** king satanists |
|
By: legalise_drugs
8/07/2009
1:26 am Yahoo! Profile:
legalise_drugs Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
|
| cold blooded devil worshipers and snake F$Ckers |
|
By: inbound39
8/07/2009
5:59 am Yahoo! Profile:
inbound39 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
|
| And where do you fit in the equation LD....a confused,deluded,self sabotaging drug abuser! |
|
By: inbound39
8/07/2009
6:13 am Yahoo! Profile:
inbound39 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
|
Ariel Sharon always believed, as did other Likud leaders,that the settlements would be the best way of preventing the establishment of a Palestinian state in the West Bank. It turns out that they were probably right. Many today even question the very viability of a Palestinian state because of the settlements.
Yet the entire international community, with the exception of Iran, Libya and perhaps Israel (look at the club of nations we have joined), believes that a Palestinian state must be established on the basis of the June 4, 1967 borders. There is no other solution to the conflict. Instead of dealing with that reality, the government is trying to pressure the US and the EU to transform the peace process into a regional peace process.
Netanyahu, Barak and other members of the government think that if they agree to a three-month settlement freeze, not including Jerusalem, the world will consent. The EU and the US in private meetings with Netanyahu and in public statements have insisted that Israel must focus on the settlement issue and not on tricks to avoid making the difficult decisions. All settlement building must stop. |
|
By: inbound39
8/07/2009
6:14 am Yahoo! Profile:
inbound39 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
|
While this is a tactical issue from the standpoint of moving forward with the peace process, since even a full settlement freeze will change nothing on the ground, it does have strategic consequences. The settlement freeze is meant to be an indication that Israel has accepted the principle that the occupation must come to an end. Only then will it be really possible for the rest of the Arab world to consider how to phase in normalizing relations as they began to do with the outset of Oslo.
Yes, Judea and Samaria are our historical, religious and national lands, and the argument is not about our right to be there, whether the world accept that right or not. The reality is that there is no other way to achieve peace with our neighbors. There is global consensus on this issue and continued objection will only increase our isolation. Boycott, sanctions and divestment are right around the corner. The international community knows that it worked in South Africa and that it will work against Israel as well. It is time to wake up and face reality. We can, with the help and understanding of the world, led by President Barack Obama, develop a peace process that is based on real security and real peace, but we must recognize that there are no short cuts. We must signal that the occupation will come to an end and then begin to act accordingly.
The writer is the co-CEO of the Israel/Palestine Center for Research and Information. www.ipcri.org |
|
By: jamisonjohn@rocketmail.com
8/07/2009
6:31 am Yahoo! Profile:
jamisonjohn@rocketmail.com Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
|
| lol @ the Saudis have denied it. You have to be especially stupid to post an article that contradicts itself, ffffffs thick pharkin farmer. LD is taking the micky, a rebelious teenager with nothing better to do. |
|
By: inbound39
8/07/2009
6:51 am Yahoo! Profile:
inbound39 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
|
| Rebellious teenager with seriously limited intellect. |
|
By: inbound39
8/07/2009
6:52 am Yahoo! Profile:
inbound39 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
|
| Yeah JJ....Bobsadumbass is really switched on!...lmao! |
|
By: bobsagoodbugger@xtra.co.nz
8/07/2009
11:29 am Yahoo! Profile:
bobsagoodbugger@xtra.co.nz Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
|
| Boy you guys are so thick of course they will deny it. However the discussions have already taken place of that you can be assured.Mossad dont release those sort of details for no reason. Get a grip on yourself both of you Israel has the green light to go whne it believes it has to. |
|
By: bobsagoodbugger@xtra.co.nz
8/07/2009
11:40 am Yahoo! Profile:
bobsagoodbugger@xtra.co.nz Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
|
Obama shows he doesnt have the expeirence required for president.
The upheaval in Iran may have ended and, conversely, it may have hardly begun, but from what we have seen so far, several mostly somber conclusions already arise.
Hungarian rebels removing a...
Hungarian rebels removing a communist symbol, Budapest ’56. Where was America?
Photo: hungarla.com
The first is that the protesters lack firearms. This is not Budapest in the fall of 1956, when ordinary Hungarians sniped to death - often with hunting rifles - some 1,500 Soviet troops, who in turn killed 20,000 rebels (according to Nikita Khrushchev's biographer William Taubman). In Teheran this month, by the most generous estimates, there were hardly 200 fatalities in all, and the real number is apparently lower.
Teheran '09 also saw nothing quite like the massacre at Budapest's Parliament Square, where Hungarian police - prior to the Red Army's arrival - mowed down 100 demonstrators, who then stormed the Communist Party headquarters, grabbed secret service officers, lynched them and hanged them from lampposts. The Iranian revolt has so far seen no large-scale exchanges of fire of the sort that accompanied freedom's arrival in Bucharest in '89, nor a guerrilla effort of the sort that carried Fidel Castro to Havana in '59.
THE SECOND conclusion is that the Iranian rebels, unlike the Hungarians of '56, but much like the Czechs of '68, are controlling their rhetoric and limiting their goals.
RELATED
* 'The revolution in Iran has just begun'
In the Budapest of '56 the rebel leaders banged their heads not only into the Red Army's armor but also into the Soviet covenant's tablets, by announcing plans to leave the Warsaw Pact and hold free elections. The Czechs, by contrast, only said they wanted "communism with a human face," by which they meant more freedom of speech, association and artistic expression. Eventually, when Warsaw Pact tanks rumbled into Prague, the rebel leaders ordered the ... |
|
By: bobsagoodbugger@xtra.co.nz
8/07/2009
11:41 am Yahoo! Profile:
bobsagoodbugger@xtra.co.nz Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
|
It's not too late for Obama to understand the depth of the diplomatic naivete he has so far displayed, and change course, otherwise his stubborn desire to dialogue with Khamenei et al. will look like the flip side of the ayatollahs' insistence that their election was fair.
Yes, the drawbacks in the Iranian situation are numerous. The rebels lack leaders, ideas and ammunition, but Ahmadinejad has emerged as a fraud, a sour loser who wasted a precious half decade in power provoking not only the outer world from Canada to Bahrain, but the Iranian nation itself.
This is what the masses who swamped Teheran effectively shouted. Evidently, they no longer care. They may or may not be concerned about Holocaust denial, Lebanese intrigues, Gazan missiles, persecution of gays or the rest of the causes that have been dear to Ahmadinejad; what they all want is what this regime has so patently failed to deliver - jobs, goods, price stability and a better chance to get ahead in life.
The speedy announcement of a landslide made it plain that the regime had what to hide, and that it had lost what little respect it still had for its own people's intelligence, rights and power. Some in the West always believed that sooner or later the refusal to be bullied, abused and robbed makes people rebel. Such Westerners, even if they can't literally interfere on behalf of the abused, at least make a point of keeping abusers at arm's length. That is what George W. Bush did, to the scorn of self-styled pragmatists from the same school that used to question the practicality of protesting Soviet oppression while there was so much business to do there peacefully.
Well now the Iranian people have spoken, and the simplest demand to which they would surely all subscribe would be: "Mr. Obama: Don't dialogue with that man." And really, what American leader in his right mind can sit and talk with this small-time vote thief? Even if Obama can afford such a dialogue electorally (which also remain ... |
|
By: laurence_brian
8/07/2009
11:45 am Yahoo! Profile:
laurence_brian Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
|
| bob, you are such a deluded fool to believe such garbage as claimed to be released by Israel, They will claim anything in an attempt to make their case look good, and inb this they just play chicken politics, in an attempt to get support, support which will not be forthcoming. Iran, or others never took such action against Israel and their nuclear research, and now all they seek is to be the sole state within the region with nuclear weaponary, so they think they hold the region to ransom. The danger here is that they are likely to be mad enough to actually use it. If ever a state wished for its own destruction, it is Israel. Luckily there are moderates within Israel, as has been demonstrated by appeals within that country in regards a want for peace and hopefully these soon become the majority and the government. War, or an attack on anothers land is not the answer, only in peace is there an answer, and for this to occur does require a large change in Israeli politics. The rest of the world will not keep waiting, but meanwhile all Israel does is make a fool of its self on the world stage! |
|
By: laurence_brian
8/07/2009
11:54 am Yahoo! Profile:
laurence_brian Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
|
| and bob, I do not trully see a connection between your posts on eastern europe and Iran, and that of Israel and the Palestinians. Communist eastern europe is now largely history, and this occured through the power of the people, not external interferance! Iran is equally left to its people to determine its future and the direction in which it heads. Time, in itself is a great healer, and this occurs best when others agree not to be the dictator or external agressor, but there are times when such an action maybe necessary, and in this actions by your favored Israel indicate that for them the time for external interference is nearing, and this yargetted directly at the ruling factions and military within Israel. Maybe the future holds a demilitarised Israel! They seem to think their immediate neighbours should be so why not them theirselves! |
|
By: bobsagoodbugger@xtra.co.nz
8/07/2009
12:00 pm Yahoo! Profile:
bobsagoodbugger@xtra.co.nz Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
|
BWIAN
Go back to your bed your boy friend is waiting for you. |
|
By: laurence_brian
8/07/2009
12:02 pm Yahoo! Profile:
laurence_brian Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
|
| bob the bigot, go back to your fairytale bob, as it appears you know so little of life. |
|
By: dirtydsnz
8/07/2009
12:02 pm Yahoo! Profile:
dirtydsnz Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
|
| wow, great reply bob, did you put that together all by yourself or did your sheepy "baaarbara" help you, go back to the side of the cliff with her ya hick!!! |
|
