Welcome, Guest   [ Message Boards home | Sign in ]
  Message Boards

Sport Message Boards

Cricket

OK Ryder, I was wrong!

Messages: Sorting:
<< Previous page | 1 | Next page >>
Author/Date Message

By: palladin22
27/03/2009
12:17 pm

Yahoo! Profile:
  palladin22

Did this message offend you?
  Sign in to report abuse

Re:OK Ryder, I was wrong! Reply to this message
OK Ryder...201.

Last comment on this thread.

Well done mate.

THE END.

By: palladin22
27/03/2009
12:09 pm

Yahoo! Profile:
  palladin22

Did this message offend you?
  Sign in to report abuse

Re:OK Ryder, I was wrong! Reply to this message
Bl oo dy hell, humble pie and chipps Ryder!!!!!
200 now ?????????

Thanks a lot mate....

By: palladin22
27/03/2009
11:47 am

Yahoo! Profile:
  palladin22

Did this message offend you?
  Sign in to report abuse

Re:OK Ryder, I was wrong! Reply to this message
Agree SAS, unless Martin comes through.
Makings of a great side.

By: sasnz2@rocketmail.com
27/03/2009
11:03 am

Yahoo! Profile:
  sasnz2@rocketmail.com

Did this message offend you?
  Sign in to report abuse

Re:OK Ryder, I was wrong! Reply to this message
Good on you Palladin for eating humble pie, I think we have one of the strongest batting lineups that i have seen for the last 15 years, just need to get them all on form at once and we will be a very formidable team to beat. Unfortuntely it cant be said the same for our bowling lineup. Although not completely useless i dont think it is a real threat to a good batting side like india. My money is a draw on this game.

By: wannapartynow
27/03/2009
8:31 am

Yahoo! Profile:
  wannapartynow

Did this message offend you?
  Sign in to report abuse

Re:OK Ryder, I was wrong! Reply to this message
Another unfortunate scenario, as the new ball is still in play: we lose a few wickets quickly and give advantage back to India. Lets hope Ryder and McCullum don't get overconfident and throw it all away. Anything less than 550 and we could still end up losing this match.

By: palladin22
27/03/2009
8:25 am

Yahoo! Profile:
  palladin22

Did this message offend you?
  Sign in to report abuse

Re:OK Ryder, I was wrong! Reply to this message
500+ is a mandatory after the start.
McCullum should thrive on this track and is due. I honestly think Franklin could pull a large one here too, he certainly has the ability all he needs is the self belief.
Laxman is due a score. Tendulkar will always be a threat on a flat track. Sewag is actually due a failure.
We should bat all day - grind these guys into submission and post 580.

By: mattyngnz
27/03/2009
8:17 am

Yahoo! Profile:
  mattyngnz

Did this message offend you?
  Sign in to report abuse

Re:OK Ryder, I was wrong! Reply to this message
Yeah - all fair points. We definately need to push on and get at least another 200-250. I'm dreading the thought of Sehwag and Tendulkar batting on this pitch over the next few days!

By: palladin22
27/03/2009
7:51 am

Yahoo! Profile:
  palladin22

Did this message offend you?
  Sign in to report abuse

Re:OK Ryder, I was wrong! Reply to this message
Well matty, considering he could have been caught at slip for 12....he'll take the 151 I think.

By: richardcates26
26/03/2009
3:29 pm

Yahoo! Profile:
  richardcates26

Did this message offend you?
  Sign in to report abuse

Re:OK Ryder, I was wrong! Reply to this message
Yeah good point matty, i suppose if he had nicked out or lbw to a good peice of bowling it would be more acceptable. But he is an aggresive batsmen. Still 151 is pretty good.

By: mattyngnz
26/03/2009
3:19 pm

Yahoo! Profile:
  mattyngnz

Did this message offend you?
  Sign in to report abuse

Re:OK Ryder, I was wrong! Reply to this message
However, in response to the original blog - Ryder can indeed play, he's showing he's not a one trick pony.

By: mattyngnz
26/03/2009
3:18 pm

Yahoo! Profile:
  mattyngnz

Did this message offend you?
  Sign in to report abuse

Re:OK Ryder, I was wrong! Reply to this message
Is anyone slightly annoyed at Taylor's dismissal? I know the guy hit 151 but he could have gone on and hit 200-250....am I being picky? I think it was more the method of his dismissal ie slog to cow corner again.....

By: richardcates26
26/03/2009
3:14 pm

Yahoo! Profile:
  richardcates26

Did this message offend you?
  Sign in to report abuse

Re:OK Ryder, I was wrong! Reply to this message
Well done Palladin, good on ya mate! The boy is good, s**t he is good.

By: insider.kiwi
26/03/2009
3:01 pm

Yahoo! Profile:
  insider.kiwi

Did this message offend you?
  Sign in to report abuse

Re:OK Ryder, I was wrong! Reply to this message
man that's out of it mate because I just posted the Ryder question to you in my thread. haha hard case man

By: palladin22
26/03/2009
2:57 pm

Yahoo! Profile:
  palladin22

Did this message offend you?
  Sign in to report abuse

OK Ryder, I was wrong! Reply to this message
I'm man enough to say I was wrong.
I knew Ryder has ability, but I didn't think he had the maturity and skill to adapt his game from power to touch, as needed.

He can.
He did.

I was wrong.

The boy really can play.

Nice to be wrong.
<< Previous page | 1 | Next page >>

Sport Message Boards

Cricket

OK Ryder, I was wrong!


Search:
Advertise with us | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Help
Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! All rights reserved.
Yahoo!Xtra: A Yahoo!7/Telecom New Zealand Company.