By: paul1nec
19/11/2007
7:29 am Yahoo! Profile:
paul1nec Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
I have to agree, Adine had a SHOCKER of a series. She should have been replaced in more than 1 game!! I too believe that she was 'in it for herself'.... What was Ruth thinking!! She hardly even featured in either the Jamaica or Australia games. Both WD's had her so wrapped up she was hardly available to feed the shooters, when she was finally able to receive a pass she was in that 'stinking corner'. Knowing what we know now, was this to protect herself??
Good Luck for 2011 |
|
By: xtr365705@xtra.co.nz
19/11/2007
7:20 am Yahoo! Profile:
xtr365705@xtra.co.nz Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| I agree. Just as bad as the Henry playing Carter still recovering from an injury; playing McCaw recovering from an injury' playing Robinson who up until that match was a food bill; playing others who had lost their mongrel after the haka because they wanted to keep themselves fit for those lucrative Euro. contracts. |
|
By: solutionz@xtra.co.nz
19/11/2007
6:32 am Yahoo! Profile:
solutionz@xtra.co.nz Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
Well...there you go. If the coaching and management didn't know that Miss Goldie wasn't 14 weeks gone, then something is wrong.
Adine was clearly there for herself. This probably explains why she had such a shocker of a series.
...and yes...it's time to go for Ruth and Struth..... |
|
