By: teko360
30/06/2009
4:27 pm |
Message deleted. Reason: Breach of terms of service |
|
By: horak@xtra.co.nz
30/06/2009
4:22 pm Yahoo! Profile:
horak@xtra.co.nz Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| you don't know anything do you? But lucky for us that's what the wold think of kiwis. thanks for making the worlds point stronger. Now go get dressed in something warm like your mother said and go do your homework. come come, run along. |
|
By: j.hukui
30/06/2009
2:36 pm Yahoo! Profile:
j.hukui Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| he will get more |
|
By: horak@xtra.co.nz
30/06/2009
2:19 pm Yahoo! Profile:
horak@xtra.co.nz Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| SA going to appeal Bothas suspension :-) |
|
By: horak@xtra.co.nz
30/06/2009
10:25 am Yahoo! Profile:
horak@xtra.co.nz Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| There is so much double standards in rugby these days. I know you don't like hearing the truth BUT the o'druscal clear out omanga did deserved at least 4 weeks. If you difer from this opinion, then i never want to hear anyone is playing dirty again. |
|
By: j.hukui
30/06/2009
7:47 am Yahoo! Profile:
j.hukui Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| the 8 weeks hardly sets a good example, got it wrong |
|
By: andybearcaerphilly
30/06/2009
7:16 am Yahoo! Profile:
andybearcaerphilly Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| Yep eye gouging 6 months no argument,Bakkies, well I thought it a clear out, but he did line him up, |
|
By: larksea
30/06/2009
7:08 am Yahoo! Profile:
larksea Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
I think that with botha's ban you have to consider that the guy is up for cr@p like this constantly. Compared to Thorn who is hardly ever sited for foul play.
And IMO the 8 week bans for eye gouging are not enough, in both cases. That's the most cowardly cr@p out there and gives the game a bad name. They should toss the book at it and give these guys 6 months off to ponder their carriers. |
|
By: shippymcwhippy01
29/06/2009
7:36 pm Yahoo! Profile:
shippymcwhippy01 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| Agree totally there. You look at what the Italian guy did for 8 weeks and then you look at what burger did and see how it is possible to get the exact same amount of time. Bakkies was clearing out a ruck. Nothing really in there. Compare that to when Thorn upended Smit without the ball and only got 1 week... |
|
By: horak@xtra.co.nz
29/06/2009
4:07 pm Yahoo! Profile:
horak@xtra.co.nz Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| Both of these are a joke. Bakkies should not have got anything and Burger should have got at least 10 - 12 weeks |
|
By: shippymcwhippy01
29/06/2009
3:45 pm Yahoo! Profile:
shippymcwhippy01 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
Botha got 2 weeks for his indiscretion. He will miss the first test but will be back in time for the boks first game against nz.
Burger got 8 weeks. Should have gotten more as it was blatant eye gouging. |
|
