By: wharfie72
30/10/2009
6:52 pm Yahoo! Profile:
wharfie72 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| There is no world cup in 2011! There is only one true World Cup and it is run by FIFA. The next one is 2010 in Sth Africa. |
|
By: zee_man36
30/10/2009
6:20 pm Yahoo! Profile:
zee_man36 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| yea boi all blax forever da bomb squad |
|
By: olek_baresark
28/10/2009
8:31 pm Yahoo! Profile:
olek_baresark Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
THE ALL JOKES
every 4 years another excuse LOL
they need to harden up like the safricans
i love watching the boks they MURDALIZE teams no sissy all jokes craap just confrontational knock em down, drag em out stuff
ALL JOKES WILL NOT WIN THE WORLD CUP
the all blacks are a business LOL not a sports team
THEY DITCHED CANTERBURY SO COULD WEAR GERMAN SHIIT LOL
WAT THE FK DO GERMANS KNOW ABOUT RUGBY ? |
|
By: moorem93
28/10/2009
5:49 pm Yahoo! Profile:
moorem93 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| springbokheros....its been a few weeks since anyone has argued with you,,,you must have hit a nerve |
|
By: springbokheros
5/10/2009
3:23 am Yahoo! Profile:
springbokheros Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
New Zealand 2011 World Cup.
NO CHANCE. South Africa will win it against a wonderful Australian team in the final. New Zealand will lose to a northern hemisphere team AGAIN in the quarterfinals.
Nostradamus's bets.
South Africa World Champions 2011
Australia runners-up
Ireland 3rd
France 4th
In closing, you can never call yourself a power rugby nation if you have NEVER won a World Cup. In 1987 (22 years ago!) the SPRINGBOKS power was not allowed to play and therefore it DEFINENTLY was not a WORLD CUP.
We all know after trampling your '85 Cavaliers team (which had 13 of the 15 in the "world cup final" players.
World Cup for NZ? You've never won one, and won't in the forseeable future either.
You are a very, very good rugby nation, just not a POWER one like South Africa and the Aussies who have won a proper World Cup. If you had won one world cup, then maybe, but England are ranked above you in the pecking order of World Achievers.
Greatest Test Nations
1. South Africa
2. Australia
3. England
4. New Zealand
5. France
The only reason any New Zealander would say that the only true world cup is soccer, is because he cannot win at the Rugby World Cup. And who cares even if it is only gonna be won by 5 or 6 countries, the fact is, even with those better odds to win in rugby than soccer, the All Blacks can't even do that. Stop moaning you loser! South Africa - World Champions 2011. Then its 3 world cups for us, 0 for nz. Ha! What shame it must be to try so hard, and lose EVERY SINGLE TIME! |
|
By: trainer_scottmackay
4/10/2009
9:28 am Yahoo! Profile:
trainer_scottmackay Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
woodcok , tialata, franks, mackintosh
hore, de malmanche, mealamu
williams, boric, ross
mccaw, thompson, read, messam, latimer
leonard, cowan, mathewson
carter, cruden, nonu, bateman/haywood, toeava, kahui, smith, rokocoko, ranger, jane, mulliana |
|
By: ice_toeava15
23/09/2009
12:23 pm Yahoo! Profile:
ice_toeava15 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| I will lead us to glory. I need to play in my rightful position, Fullback. |
|
By: m-family@xtra.co.nz
23/09/2009
9:52 am Yahoo! Profile:
m-family@xtra.co.nz Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| dont forget springbok, Saffa wouldnt have won the cup in 87,91 because no blacks in the team, blacks the superior race in SA, just look at their positions of power, no blacks = no WC. |
|
By: downsouthee
23/09/2009
9:29 am Yahoo! Profile:
downsouthee Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| getting slightly off topic aern't we. And they play football in Antarctica (every continent) um who exactly... |
|
By: hi_im_nutty
19/09/2009
7:35 pm Yahoo! Profile:
hi_im_nutty Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| I have a feeling SA are peaking too early......Aus & NZ to be up there WC 2011.....the winner to meet SA in the final...and beat them too....... |
|
By: dachiropracter17
19/09/2009
7:08 pm Yahoo! Profile:
dachiropracter17 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
I watched 4 minutes of tonights game. What a boring game.
Easy to see why 98% of the worlds countries are just not interested. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz |
|
By: dachiropracter17
19/09/2009
7:06 pm Yahoo! Profile:
dachiropracter17 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
There is only one true world cup and it is run by FIFA and the next one is in 2010, not 2011.
I think you are referring to the farcically named rugby WC which is just a 5 nations tournament. |
|
By: springbokheros
19/09/2009
4:25 pm Yahoo! Profile:
springbokheros Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
New Zealand 2011 World Cup.
NO CHANCE. South Africa will win it against a wonderful Australian team in the final. New Zealand will lose to a northern hemisphere team AGAIN in the quarterfinals.
Nostradamus's bets.
South Africa World Champions 2011
Australia runners-up
Ireland 3rd
France 4th
In closing, you can never call yourself a power rugby nation if you have NEVER won a World Cup. In 1987 (22 years ago!) the SPRINGBOKS power was not allowed to play and therefore it DEFINENTLY was not a WORLD CUP.
We all know after trampling your '85 Cavaliers team (which had 13 of the 15 in the "world cup final" players.
World Cup for NZ? You've never won one, and won't in the forseeable future either.
You are a very, very good rugby nation, just not a POWER one like South Africa and the Aussies, each having won 2 World Cups. If you had won one world cup, then maybe, but England are ranked above you in the pecking order of World Achievers.
Greatest Test Nations
1. South Africa
2. Australia
3. England
4. New Zealand
5. France |
|
By: underwaterjack2000
16/09/2009
9:22 pm Yahoo! Profile:
underwaterjack2000 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| people like to see violence wharfie, thats why they prefer watching thugby, something you nancy-boys are to scared to get involved in. weve all been entertained enough to refrain from the on the pitch antics after the match unlike you poor tired housewives. |
|
By: underwaterjack2000
16/09/2009
9:18 pm Yahoo! Profile:
underwaterjack2000 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
shows they are still awake wharfie unlike the bored spectator who has to sit through 90 minutes of back and forward to eventually see a nil all draw!!!!!!!!!!!!zzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzz
oh game over? lets go to the pub and get drunk and smash a few bus windows on the way to liven ourselves up seeing as that was so entertaining...not! |
|
By: zorrothepuma
16/09/2009
4:47 am Yahoo! Profile:
zorrothepuma Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| cheers moorem, tonto says hi.... |
|
By: wharfie72
16/09/2009
4:32 am Yahoo! Profile:
wharfie72 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
The UEFA Champions League has more people watching than any rugby tournament.
Rugby is too boring...people actually clap when someone kicks the ball out!!!!!!!!! Doesn't say much for the other bits of the game!!!!!!!!!!!!! zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz |
|
By: moorem93
15/09/2009
6:54 pm Yahoo! Profile:
moorem93 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| i always liked zorro,,,,hiho tonto,,AWAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY YYYYYYYYYYYYYY |
|
By: underwaterjack2000
15/09/2009
5:19 pm Yahoo! Profile:
underwaterjack2000 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
only quoting stats sweetheart and stats dont lie.
given that football is played on every continent and probably by most countries I think it would be obvious after reading those stats which sport is showing the most potential. so no, Im not joking. |
|
By: kiwi_kea_99
15/09/2009
4:51 pm Yahoo! Profile:
kiwi_kea_99 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
You can twist figures any way you want but how many homes do you think had t.vs in the first 40 years of the Football World Cup??
And to say Rugby has more potential, you really are joking arn't you? |
|
By: hi_im_nutty
15/09/2009
4:48 pm Yahoo! Profile:
hi_im_nutty Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzz |
|
By: underwaterjack2000
15/09/2009
4:25 pm Yahoo! Profile:
underwaterjack2000 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
NB, half the cummulative numbers relates to:
Football, 26.29 billion divided by 18 tournaments = 1.46 billion per tournament
Rugby, 4.2 billion divided by 7 tournaments = 600 million per tounament |
|
By: underwaterjack2000
15/09/2009
4:20 pm Yahoo! Profile:
underwaterjack2000 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
2006 football world cup, 32 teams, final watched by 715 million viewers, 26.29 billion viewers over the lifetime of the tournament 72 years or 18 tournaments in total.
2007 Rugby World Cup, 20 teams, final watched by over 61 million viewers, 4.2 billion viewers over the lifetime of the tournament 20 years or 7 tounaments held.
After only 7 tournaments (marginally more than just a third) the Rugby World Cup has attracted almost half the cummulative viewing numbers of the Football World Cup.
Given that their are less teams and less nations playing rugby than Football it would be fair to say that the Rugby World Cup is showing more potential as being the most watched and most interesting event.
Rugby World Cup 2007 had the Fouth biggest audience for a sports event globally in 2007.
Football may be the "Beautiful Game" but "Rugby is the Game they Play in Heaven"......and everyone wants to go to heaven, dont they!! |
|
By: zorrothepuma
15/09/2009
3:50 pm Yahoo! Profile:
zorrothepuma Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| calm down fake chiro, you'll pop a vessel. It clearly irks you, that you talk kak. You sad little boy, there are hours of soccer to watch on telly but you sit at your PC and post on rugby threads. All of it vitriolic garbage, aimed at sledging rugby cos you like soccer more. Why can't you just go and chat with your soccer mates and be happy associating with like minded people? You don't have the ability to hold an intelligent conversation where rugby is concerned as you clearly know nothing about it. If you prefer to watch prima donna actors and divers prance about in front of rioting fans, go ahead. |
|
By: dachiropracter17
15/09/2009
1:12 pm Yahoo! Profile:
dachiropracter17 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
FYI kiwibeca the farcically named rugby WC is NOT the third most watched sporting event. That myth has been around for ages. According to the stat's it is not even in the top ten.
Use your brain!! How could a tournament that only a few countries take seriously possibly be third?! Duh!! |
|
